Dimethyl MEA

Dårlig

pH-adjuster-stabiliser

No known benefits

Dimethyl MEA description

Dimethyl MEA, also known as DMAE, is a derivative of the B vitamin choline. It has been around for years as an oral supplement that’s popularly believed to improve mental alertness, much like Ginkgo biloba and coenzyme Q10. However, the research about DMAE does not show the same positive results as the other two supplements. Because DMAE is chemically similar to choline, DMAE is thought to stimulate production of acetylcholine. And because acetylcholine is a brain neurotransmitter, it’s easy to see how it could be associated with brain function. However, only a handful of studies have looked at DMAE for that purpose and they have not been conclusive in the least, while some have shown that DMAE may be problematic or not very effective. It’s a controversial ingredient for skin because research has shown conflicting results. It seems to offer an initial benefit that improves skin firmness, but these results are short-lived and eventually give way to destruction of the substances in skin that help keep it firm. DMAE may also have skin-calming effects. Interestingly, there is a formulation challenge when including DMAE in skin care products. To maintain the efficacy and stability of DMAE, the product’s pH level must be at least 10. A pH of 10 is highly alkaline, which isn’t good news for skin. Moreover, because almost all moisturisers (including serums and eye creams) are formulated with a pH that closely matches that of human skin (generally 5.5-6.5, which is on the acidic side of the scale), in all likelihood the DMAE included in skin care products cannot have any prolonged functionality.

Dimethyl MEA references

  • Pharmazie, December 2009, pages 818-822
  • Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, Supplement 72, 2008, pages S17-S22
  • Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, November-December 2007, pages 711-718
  • British Journal of Dermatology, March 2007, pages 433-439
  • American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, Volume 6, 2005, pages 39-47
  • European Journal of Medical Research, May 2003, pages 183-191
  • Mechanisms of Aging and Development, February 1988, pages 129-138

Peer-reviewed, substantiated scientific research is used to assess ingredients in this dictionary. Regulations regarding constraints, permitted concentration levels and availability vary by country and region.

Ratings af ingredienser

Bedst

Dokumenteret og understøttet af uafhængige studier. Fremragende aktiv ingrediens til de fleste hudtyper eller hudproblemer.

God

Nødvendigt for at forbedre en formulerings tekstur, stabilitet eller penetration.

Middel

Generelt ikke-irriterende, men kan have kosmetiske, stabilitetsmæssige eller andre problemer, der begrænser dets anvendelighed.

Dårlig

Der er risiko for irritation. Risikoen øges, når det kombineres med andre problematiske ingredienser.

Dårligst

Kan forårsage irritation, inflammation, tørhed osv. Kan være en fordel i nogle tilfælde, men generelt har man påvist, at ingrediensen gør mere skade end gavn.

Ukendt

Vi kunne ikke finde denne ingrediens i vores ingrediensordbog. Vi registrerer alle manglende ingredienser og foretager løbende opdateringer.

Ikke ratet

Vi har endnu ikke ratet denne ingrediens, fordi vi ikke har haft mulighed for at gennemgå forskningen om den.