Cetyl Tranexamate Mesylate

Bedst

Humectant

Cetyl Tranexamate Mesylate at a glance

  • Derivative of tranexamic acid (TXA)
  • Helps even skin tone (dark spots, blemish marks)
  • May also visibly reduce redness
  • Delivers enhanced penetration/efficacy compared to TXA

Cetyl Tranexamate Mesylate description

Cetyl tranexamate mesylate is a “next gen” tranexamic acid (TXA) derivative designed to target skin discolorations, including dark spots and post-blemish marks. Though relatively new to the cosmetic scene, early research indicates promising results. A 2024 comparative study found cetyl tranexamate mesylate penetrates the skin more efficiently than traditional TXA, leading to improved bioavailability and potentially more effective results for evening out skin tone. Although this is encouraging, other suppliers have encapsulated tranexamic acid in various “shells” to improve bioavailability. Until more comparative studies are done, it’s premature to claim that this tranexamic acid derivative is the best form. In addition to cetyl tranexamate mesylate’s ability to minimize discolorations, manufacturer’s clinical studies also show it can help visibly reduce the appearance of redness when used at a 2% concentration. Formulators suggest incorporating cetyl tranexamate mesylate into products at a concentration of 1-5%, with a pH range of 3.5-5. A 3% concentration of cetyl tranexamate mesylate is considered equivalent to 1% tranexamic acid. While the Expert Panel for the Cosmetic Ingredient Review has yet to formally assess cetyl tranexamate mesylate’s safety, our research review did not reveal concerns. The Personal Care Products Council classifies cetyl tranexamate mesylate as a skin-conditioning agent. *Note:* While cetyl tranexamate mesylate is the official INCI name, it’s often marketed under the trade name TXVector.

Cetyl Tranexamate Mesylate references

  • Personal Care Products Council,accessed December 2024, ePublication
  • UL Prospector (supplier info), accessed December 2024, ePublication
  • Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, November 2024, pages 1-10
  • Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, February 2021, pages 561-565

Peer-reviewed, substantiated scientific research is used to assess ingredients in this dictionary. Regulations regarding constraints, permitted concentration levels and availability vary by country and region.

Ratings af ingredienser

Bedst

Dokumenteret og understøttet af uafhængige studier. Fremragende aktiv ingrediens til de fleste hudtyper eller hudproblemer.

God

Nødvendigt for at forbedre en formulerings tekstur, stabilitet eller penetration.

Middel

Generelt ikke-irriterende, men kan have kosmetiske, stabilitetsmæssige eller andre problemer, der begrænser dets anvendelighed.

Dårlig

Der er risiko for irritation. Risikoen øges, når det kombineres med andre problematiske ingredienser.

Dårligst

Kan forårsage irritation, inflammation, tørhed osv. Kan være en fordel i nogle tilfælde, men generelt har man påvist, at ingrediensen gør mere skade end gavn.

Ukendt

Vi kunne ikke finde denne ingrediens i vores ingrediensordbog. Vi registrerer alle manglende ingredienser og foretager løbende opdateringer.

Ikke ratet

Vi har endnu ikke ratet denne ingrediens, fordi vi ikke har haft mulighed for at gennemgå forskningen om den.